IMF may need ‘exceptional measures’ to facilitate pandemic response – Georgieva

The International Monetary Fund may need to step outside its comfort zone and consider “exceptional measures” to help countries deal with the coronavirus pandemic and mitigate its economic impact, Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said on Monday.

Georgieva, in a blog published on the IMF website, said the fund had already taken extraordinary steps to free up resources, especially for emerging markets and developing economies that have seen an outflow of $100 billion in recent months – the highest on record.

.@KGeorgieva: The crisis is more complex, more uncertain, and truly global. How have we strengthened the IMF arsenal and taken exceptional measures to help our member countries? #IMFBlog https://t.co/Uh0vYbhzO7 pic.twitter.com/EQ993wYhfY

— IMF (@IMFNews) April 20, 2020

But more resources may be needed if market pressures continue to mount, and lending – even on easy terms – is not always the best solution, given already high debt burdens faced by many countries, she said.

“The IMF, like our member countries, may need to venture even further outside our comfort zone to consider whether exceptional measures might be needed in this exceptional crisis,” she said, suggesting increased collaboration with other international institutions and the private sector.

A global crisis like no other needs a global response like no other—here are the concrete & immediate actions the IMF is taking to help our member countries: https://t.co/zaa4vlpUyp pic.twitter.com/kgIg1tJAEp

— Kristalina Georgieva (@KGeorgieva) April 20, 2020

Georgieva gave no details, but her remarks came after a joint IMF-World Bank paper published on Friday said a broader group of countries – beyond the 77 poorest countries that have already been promised a suspension in debt payments on official bilateral loans – may need debt relief.

Georgieva also revived her call for a possible allocation of Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), the IMF’s official unit of exchange, that would be akin to a central bank “printing” new money. The United States has opposed such a move.

The IMF last forecast the global economy would contract by 3% in 2020 due to the pandemic, marking the steepest downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

“We stand ready to deploy our full lending capacity and to mobilize all layers of the global financial safety net, including whether the use of SDRs could be more helpful, Georgieva wrote in the blog.

US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin last week rejected an SDR allocation, arguing that 70% of the funds created through that would go to G20 countries, most of which did not need it, while only 3% would go to low-income countries.

SDRs are based on dollars, euro, yen, sterling and yuan. Member countries hold them at the fund in proportion to their shareholdings.

Reuters last week reported that the United States, the IMF’s dominant shareholder, is blocking an allocation because it would give new avenues of funding for Iran and China.

Mnuchin urged advanced economies to contribute instead to two IMF facilities that provide funds to the poorest countries, and said the US government was exploring such a contribution. A Treasury official said a US contribution to one or both of the funds would require congressional approval, and potentially new funds. No further details were immediately available.

In her blog, Georgieva lauded the generosity of Britain, Japan, Germany, the Netherlands, Singapore and China in boosting the resources available in the Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust, which helps the IMF’s poorest members by providing grants to cover their debt service payments to the IMF.

She also recognized Japan, France, Britain, Canada and Australia for pledges to expand the IMF’s Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust to $11.7 billion, taking the fund to about 70% of its $17 billion goal.