Login / Register
Discussion Forums
Google
   Listen Live
Click for a list of RSS feeds
Media clips require Real Player
South African Broadcasting Corporation Copyright ©
2000 - 2005 SABC
 

Homosexuality against the Bible, court hears

Ministers presiding over same sex marriages may be investigated

A dissident group of ministers has challenged the leadership's directive not to oversee such unions

May 17, 2005, 15:30

Homosexuality is against the Bible and so same sex marriages should not be allowed. This is what the Constitutional Court heard from a religious factions who have been allowed to contribute to the court's deliberations on the legal definition of marriage.

The court is hearing an application to appeal a Supreme Court of Appeal ruling that a common law should be developed to allow same sex marriage. "There is no escaping the fact that in both testaments homosexual acts are condemned in very strong language," said John Smyth of Doctors For Life.

Same sex unions deeply wounding for religious people, Smyth
Smyth says to allow same sex unions would cause "violence to the mind and spirit" of deeply religious people and would discriminate against them. He quoted sections of the Bible according to which God said that a man and a woman must "cleave" together to procreate.

However, at this point, Judge Albie Sachs interjected to say it would be a "worrying day" if judges were asked to give meaning to religious texts. Kate O'Regan, another judge said that marriage was sacred, not just because of religious texts.

Earlier, the Marriage Alliance defined marriage as a unique institution that recognised the lifelong partnership between a man and a woman and that sex Gerrit Pretorius, their advocate says that allowing same sex marriages would eventually lead to discrimination against heterosexual couples.

Meanwhile, the department of home affairs believes that when the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that a common law must be developed to allow same-sex marriages, it did so without having the authority to do so.

Earlier, statements by the department's advocate were met with laughter and gasps of disbelief from the public gallery. "Same-sex partnerships are a relatively new phenomenon...We don't know whether single-sex relationships involve the idea of mutual support," said Marumo Moerane, the advocate for the department. - Sapa

Click here to send this article to a friend     Click here for a printable version of this article     Report by Mahlatse Gallens on scenes outside Concourt hearing on same sex marriages     Gay and lesbian couples took another step in the long journey to have same-sex marriages legalised    
RELATED STORIES
Challenge on definition of marriage (May 17, 2005, 07:00)
Same-sex marriages threat to democracy: Masa (May 11, 2005, 17:45)
Gay and lesbian alliance out of tune (April 27, 2005, 13:15)
Community says no to same-sex relationships (February 15, 2005, 17:00)
Christian Network criticises ruling on gay marriage (November 30, 2004, 20:45)
Activists welcome ruling on same-sex couple (November 30, 2004, 12:45)
 
 Weather
Min: 12
Max: 31
Current Affairs
 Fokus
 Special Assignment
 Cutting Edge
Other Site Features
 SABC News International
 News Agency
 Afrique Nouvelles
 Audio Bulletins
 Video Bulletins
 Personalise
 Journalists Blogs
 
News Awards
 Community Media Awards
 Discussion Forums
 Matric results info
 FAQs
 Contact Us
 Help
 Disclaimer
Sponsored Links
Online insurance
Life insurance
Insurance for women