Home

‘Can of Doom not admissible evidence’

Reading Time: < 1 minute

The defence in the assault trial of a self-proclaimed prophet who allegedly sprayed insecticide on congregants does not want a can of Doom to be admissible evidence.

Lethebo Rabalago is facing five assault charges for an incident that allegedly happened in November last year during a church service in Mookgophong.

He also faces charges that relate to the use of an agricultural product in a manner it is not intended for and of publishing false advertisements.

The defense’s Edmond Lubisi argued that Rabalago cannot be held criminally liable for any misleading advertising that has been published on his church’s Facebook page as the page is administered by a group of church members.

Rabalago is facing two charges of contravening the Agricultural Remedies and Stock Remedies Act of 1947.

Author

MOST READ