Login / Register
Discussion Forums
Search
  /Go
Advanced Search
   Listen Live
Click for a list of RSS feeds
Media clips require Real Player
South African Broadcasting Corporation Copyright ©
2000 - 2005 SABC
 

Mittal steel guilty of excessive prices: tribunal

March 27, 2007, 13:45

South African steel giant Mittal Steel has contravened the Competition Act by charging excessive prices, the Competition Tribunal ruled today. It found that the company contravened Section 8(a) of the Competition Act by charging an excessive price for its flat steel products to the detriment of consumers.

The tribunal, however, dismissed a complaint that Mittal Steel contravened the Act by inducing its customers not to deal with a competitor. The facts presented on the second matter were not satisfactory, the tribunal said. "We would want to proceed with particular care on an inducement allegation."

The tribunal postponed a decision on penalties for the company's contravention. It said it needed to hear further evidence in connection with the extent, if any, of the administrative penalty to be imposed.

"Although the record is complete in regard to the remaining remedies... we consider it undesirable to consider remedies in a piecemeal fashion." Harmony Gold Mining Company and Durban Roodepoort Deep have filed a complaint against Mittal Steel and Macsteel International Holdings BV.

Harmony alleged that Mittal SA was a dominant firm in the domestic market for flat primary steel products and that it had abused this dominance by charging, in contravention of the Competition Act, excessive prices for its flat steel products. The complainants also claimed Mittal SA contravened the Act, in that it required or induced customers to not deal with a competitor.

Mittal Steel expressed disappointment at the ruling that it had contravened the Competition Act by charging excessive prices. The company, however, welcomed the dismissal of the complaint that it induced its customers not to deal with a competitor.

Rick Reato, the Mittal Steel chief executive, said the company's legal team would study the reasons for the judgement once it has received a copy from the tribunal. "We currently are unable to comment further on the ruling until we have seen the reasons for the judgement. We believe however, that we have a strong legal case and will be considering our legal options," Reato said. - Sapa

Click here to send this article to a friend     Click here for a printable version of this article    
RELATED STORIES
Numsa to strike over steel price (November 07, 2006, 19:15)
Court to hear student's case against Mittal (May 19, 2006, 14:45)
 
 Weather
Min: 4
Max: 21
Current Affairs
 Fokus
 Special Assignment
 Cutting Edge
Other Site Features
 SABC News International
 News Agency
 Afrique Nouvelles
 Audio Bulletins
 Video Bulletins
 Personalise
 Community Media Awards
 Discussion Forums
 Matric results info
 FAQs
 Contact Us
 Help
 Disclaimer
Sponsored Links
Online insurance
Life insurance
Life Insurance for Women
Insurance for Women
New & used cars
Compare Insurance Quotes
Gold Credit Card